Experience

Rockbridge Legal provided legal support to SIA “Ezersēta” and Alex Rasmussen, the long-standing manager of SIA “Gaižēni”, in a transaction resulting in the Latvian investment company “Merito Partners”, together with investors, acquiring a majority stake in one of Latvia’s leading livestock and agricultural companies – SIA “Gaižēni”. As a result of the transaction, “Merito Partners”, […]

Rockbridge Legal and its partner Viktorija Jarkina-Toča assisted a client in a dispute with a municipality regarding compensation for damages. The process has concluded with a settlement. The client sought legal assistance regarding long-standing litigation over ownership rights to several plots of land. The case evaluated previous municipal decisions on the allocation of land for

SIA “Ignitis Latvija” Enters Latvian Households – RockBridge Legal Provides Legal Support for Compliance with Electricity Market Regulations and Consumer Protection. SIA “Ignitis Latvija” has taken the next step in expanding its operations by introducing electricity (and gas) trading products for Latvian households. This launch is the result of 2 years of intensive work, a

RockBridge Legal successfully represented the joint-stock company “BŪVUZŅĒMUMS RESTAURATORS” in a dispute with the State Revenue Service regarding the repayment of Covid-19 support amounting to €100,000. The Administrative Regional Court ruled that the service had unjustifiably revoked the decision to grant support and groundlessly demanded its repayment. Initially, the State Revenue Service had decided to

more one criminal proceeding terminated. Viktorija Jarkina-Toča together with the team proved the Latvian customs’ error and saved the client’s valuable goods from confiscation. Viktorija Jarkina-Toča together with the team proved the Latvian customs’ error and saved the client’s valuable goods from confiscation. The criminal proceeding was initiated based on SRS Customs Board materials, taking

RockBridge Legal partner and attorney Viktorija Jarkina-Toča, together with her team, proved the error of Latvian customs and saved the client’s valuable goods from confiscation. The criminal proceedings were initiated based on materials from the SRS Customs Board, considering the SRS Customs Board’s suspicions of an attempt to circumvent sanctions by declaring goods subject to